News

Linda Sarsour apologises to Jewish members of Women’s March

Linda Sarsour released a statement apologising on behalf of the Women’s March for causing harm to the movement’s Jewish members, and for being too slow to show its commitment to fighting anti-Semitism.

Published

on

BEN SALES

“We should have been faster and clearer in helping people understand our values and our commitment to fighting anti-Semitism. We regret that,” read the statement issued on Tuesday afternoon.

“Every member of our movement matters to us – including our incredible Jewish and LGBTQ [lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender] members. We are deeply sorry for the harm we have caused, but we see you, we love you, and we are fighting with you.”

The Women’s March organised mass protests against President Donald Trump in January 2017, and has since been a leading liberal activist group working on behalf of women’s empowerment.

The organisation has come under renewed fire recently for Co-Chair Tamika Mallory’s associations with Louis Farrakhan, the virulently anti-Semitic leader of the Nation of Islam.

In February, Mallory posted a photo of herself with Farrakhan after he gave a speech laced with anti-Semitic statements. Following an outcry over the incident, the Women’s March released a statement saying, “Minister Farrakhan’s statements about Jewish, queer, and trans people are not aligned with the Women’s March unity principles.”

The controversy bubbled up again recently, when actress Alyssa Milano said she would not speak at next year’s Women’s March because she felt that it had not adequately addressed anti-Semitism. On Monday, Women’s March co-founder Teresa Shook called on the movement’s current organisers to step down because they have “allowed anti-Semitism”.

In her statement on Tuesday, Sarsour said the group wanted to have a better relationship with the Jewish community.

“Trying to dismantle oppression, while working within systems of oppression, is hard,” Sarsour wrote. “We are deeply invested in building better and deeper relationships with the Jewish community. And we’re committed to deepening relationships with any community which has felt left out of this movement. We want to create a space where all are welcome.”

The statement strikes a somewhat different tone to the one Sarsour published on Monday, in which she again distanced the group from Farrakhan, but also suggested that criticism of the Women’s March was a deflection from focusing on anti-Semitism from the far right. She said the underlying reason people criticise her is not because of associations with Farrakhan, but because she is a Palestinian American.

“It’s very clear to me what the underlying issue is. I am a bold, outspoken, BDS [Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions] supporting Palestinian Muslim American woman, and the opposition’s worst nightmare,” she wrote. “They have tried every tactic at their disposal to undermine me, discredit me, vilify me but my roots are too deep, and my work is too clear, and they have not succeeded, so by proxy they began attacking my sister, Tamika Mallory, knowing all too well that in this country, the most discardable woman is a black woman.”

Sarsour has been a polarising figure to American Jews. Some on the right and centre point to her anti-Zionist activism. This week, the American Jewish Committee condemned her for criticising “folks who masquerade as progressives, but always choose their allegiance to Israel over their commitment to democracy and free speech”, saying it echoed the historical smear that Jews have dual loyalty.

But some progressive Jews have worked with Sarsour, and defended her from charges of anti-Semitism. They point to her fundraising for the funerals of victims of the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting, as well as her raising funds on behalf of a vandalised Jewish cemetery.

On Tuesday night, soon after posting the apology, Sarsour posted a defiant statement praising the Women’s March on Facebook.

“Don’t let people who have not contributed nor put their bodies on the line define this moment,” she wrote, referencing Shook and other critics. “T]hose who understand that we are all vulnerable under a fascist administration will define this moment. We will win together. We will write history together. It will be a messy history full of trials and tribulations, hurt and pain, but with the consistent understanding that people are counting on us.” 

1 Comment

  1. Julia Lutch

    November 26, 2018 at 8:56 am

    ‘Some progressive Jews, we are told, point to Linda Sarsour’s fundraising for funerals of victims of the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting and on behalf of a vandalized Jewish cemetery as evidence that, in her words, “…we see you, we love you, and we are fighting with you.”

    Ah, those lovable, silent Jewish dead.

    Sarsour has no shame about using our Jewish dead for political, virtue-signaling optics. But Zionism, national independence for living Jews and for a living Jewish future, is “creepy,” according to Sarsour.

    She said, “We should have been faster and clearer in helping people understand our values and our commitment to fighting antisemitism,” but she has been very clear about her contempt for Zionism, our right to be a free people in our own (tiny) land, while Palestinian national aspirations have never been disparaged as “creepy” by Sarsour.

    “When people criticize Zionists, they mean Jews. You’re talking antisemitism” – attributed to Martin Luther King, Jr.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending

Exit mobile version