Israel

The holiness of the BDS movement

Dr Dean Lutrin opines: “For the first time in millennia, we are in a position of strength and we as a people are conflicted as to how we should wield our power”

Published

on

DEAN LUTRIN

Hundreds of Gazan civilians have died in Operation Protective Edge. Predictably, this has led to organisations such as the BDS and “Jews for Justice in Palestine” expressing vocal opposition to current Israeli policies. Many Jews announce proudly that they support the Palestinians and express shame at how Israel is conducting itself. Those who defend Israel claim that its military conduct is beyond reproach and that each civilian death is an unintended tragedy.

The mainstream Zionist and Jewish community believes that Hamas are responsible for Palestinian civilian deaths as a result of the use of human shields.

The Jewish community gives the title of “self-hating Jew” to all those who stand in solidarity with the Palestinians rather than giving unquestioning support to the state of Israel and its defence forces. These people are seen as an embarrassment and danger to the interests of Jews everywhere.
In reply, the Jews who are vocal in support of the Palestinian cause say that Israel is behaving in an ethically unacceptable manner and that the only appropriate response is harsh criticism of Israeli politics and military decisions.

Should Israel aspire to a higher moral standard
 than the mediocre benchmarks of the
United Nations and the Geneva Convention?  

 

The Israelis have used more restraint in this war than any other army has in modern military history. The Israeli army believes that it upholds each and every principle of the Geneva Convention. Yet, Israel is held to a higher standard than the rest of the world. The condemnation levelled against Israel by the world is completely out of proportion to its supposed crimes.

It is uplifting that there are so many Jews who understand the magnitude of the threat against Israel and remain optimistic in their hope for peace. They are generous in their belief that it is possible to reconcile with people and organisations who have explicitly declared their genocidal intentions.

These “self-hating Jews” represent the best of what Judaism has to teach the world. They are not content with keeping to the Geneva Convention. They believe that Israel should aspire to a higher moral standard than the mediocre benchmarks of the United Nations. We see the visions of morality of the prophets of the bible and we set our bar at that level.

 

If we are being bombed from a mosque then that place becomes a legitimate military target, yet Jewish ethics demands more of us. We expect Jewish soldiers to be able to destroy the weapons without destroying the minaret. We are hopeful that Jewish technical ingenuity will give us the precision we need so that we can avoid as much collateral damage as possible.

 

Jews are an optimistic people. Our faith that a better day is around the corner has given us the courage to withstand pogrom after pogrom. That optimism leads us to ceasefire after ceasefire in the hope that there can be a political solution to the current conflict. We are fortunate to be living in a time where Jews are no longer powerless. For the first time in millennia, we are in a position of strength and we as a people are conflicted as to how we should wield our power.

 

Israel has never intentionally targeted civilians but their presence on the battlefield is an incredibly difficult challenge for us. The accusation that a Jewish army is wilfully killing Palestinian children is a terrible blood libel that should be rejected outright.

 

I expect that with time the memory of BDS, “Not In Our Name” and “Jews for Justice in Palestine” will be a minor footnote in Jewish history. I expect that their supporters’ hostility to the Jewish people will virtually guarantee that their children or grandchildren will not marry Jewish and tragically they will be lost forever.
But the message that they convey – that the Jewish people have always been and will always be a “kingdom of priests and holy nation” with a responsibility to be a light unto the nations, is one that remains true.

 

  • Dr Dean Lutrin is a prominent Johannesburg surgeon. He is Orthodox, a member of the Mizrachi community, and is on the faculty of the Acadamy Jewish Thought and Learning

4 Comments

  1. Sandra Meyberg

    August 18, 2014 at 4:05 pm

    ‘Brilliant and so very true.’

  2. David Fachler

    August 19, 2014 at 2:53 pm

    ‘I appreciate the willingness to see the good and positive in everything, even in destructive movements such as BDS, which undermines the very existence of the State of Israel. Yet this article suffers from a hgh level of naiveté.

    Being holy according to Judaism means living by the Torah and the morality it prescribes. The Jewish people and the Israeli military have no right to sacrifice their own for the purpose of another nation. The expectations of the BDS movement and of Not in MyName and their ilk will force loss of Jewish lives in favour of enemy lives. Civilian deaths are obviously regrettable yet they cannot be saved by sacrificing our own soldiers. No army in the world does that. To do so would in fact be less moral, and could end up as something evil

    A kingdom of priests listens to G-d not to emotional misunderstandings of morality. Unfortunately there is nothing positive about the BDS and their supposed and very selective \”morality\” is merely a mask for their antisemitism’

  3. Dean Lutrin

    August 25, 2014 at 12:06 pm

    ‘David – I appreciate your comments. I feel most at home in the right wing settler camp and I feel such anger towards these movements yet hope that there must be something positive in them. I am talking to the Jewish members of these movements, not the antisemitic non-Jewish & non-Jewish supporters. I agree that the people and its military should not sacrifice themselves in favour of enemy lives. I would like to believe that the BDS can use their profound morality (albeit misguided) to find a route back to Halachik Judaism. Similar to  how many Zionists could find their way back by working the land.

    Dean’

  4. Myron Robinson

    September 9, 2014 at 5:18 pm

    ‘It is a pity that you did not give Prof Dugard a lesson in International Law. Like so many of his ilk they are blind to any positive support for Israel. Judging from his debate with Dershowitz, Dugard who is/was inter alia a Judge on the ICC as well as a SA CONCOURT Judge has from his interpretation of International Law the same interpretation of our Legal system as the JSC. He does not understand the law & the facts confuse him. He then expects Israel to appear before the ICC when he & likeminded Judges will be one of the Arbiters. Incompetent he is not so the only conclusion left is that his comments about Israel which were in any event factually incorrect were disingenuous.’

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending

Exit mobile version